Click here to go back to main page on research

Abstracts of Published Pilot Studies on the Alexander Technique
The studies cited here represent the work of several researchers, working with limited resources, dating back to the late 1980s.

STAT is aware that these studies cannot be considered statistically significant owing to their small sample sizes and, in certain cases, a failure to meet all the criteria conventionally applied to academic research. However, these studies may point to the desirability and feasibility of further, more rigorous research on a larger scale and with greater funding.

Indeed, one of the studies listed here was followed by a second, larger one, which is listed in the page on recently completed research and work in progress

The abstracts are displayed chronologically, starting with the most recent.

The texts are reprinted as they appeared in their original publications, and do not necessarily represent the views of STAT.


THE ABSTRACTS

Functional Reach Improvement in Normal Older Women After Alexander Technique Instruction
Author: Ronald J. Dennis
Journal: Journal of Gerontology (1999) 54A M8-M11

Abstract:
BACKGROUND
Functional reach (FR) is a clinical measure of balance. The Alexander Technique (AT) is a nonexercise approach to the improvement of body mechanics. This study investigated a possible relationship between FR performance and AT instruction.

METHODS
Three groups comprising women older than 65, with the exception of one male control, were studied:
1 a pilot group
2 experimental group
3 control group
Groups 1 and 2 were given eight 1-hour, bi-weekly sessions of AT instruction with pre- and posttests in FR, whereas group 3 was only given pre- and posttests in FR.

RESULTS
Groups 1 and 2 both showed significant improvement in FR performance. Group 2 was retested 1 month after posttest and showed a slight decrease in FR performance. For Groups 1 and 2, a questionnaire allowing qualitative responses on a four-item scale showed an overall positive response to the AT instruction.

CONCLUSIONS
AT instruction may be effective in improving balance and therefore reducing the incidence of falls in normal older women.

Copyright © The Gerontological Society of America.
Reproduced by permission of the publisher.
To consult the whole article, contact Journal of Gerontology.


An Evaluation of the Alexander Technique for the Management of Disability in Parkinson's Disease - a Preliminary Study
Author: C. Stallibrass
Journal: Clinical Rehabilitation (1997) 11 7-12

Abstract:
OBJECTIVE
To test the effect of the Alexander Technique (AT) on the management of disability and feelings of depression in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

DESIGN
Subjects completed four self-report questionnaires, one set before the course of lessons and a repeat set when the lessons were ended. The postal questionnaires were mailed directly to the subject's home from the university with a stamped addressed envelope.

SUBJECTS
Seven volunteers, with no previous experience of the Alexander Technique, diagnosed by consultant neurologists to have idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

SETTING
The subjects were contacted by the nearest registered AT teacher and were taught in the individual teacher's practice rooms, in the same way as other pupils.

INTERVENTIONS
Subjects received a median of 12 lessons.

MEASURES
The self-report measures were the BECK Depression Inventory, activities in daily living, body concept, and social functioning disability questionnaires.

RESULTS
Post-lessons the subjects were significantly (p<0.05) less depressed. They had a significantly more positive body concept and had significantly less difficulty in performing daily activities, and significantly less difficulty on the fine movement and gross movement subscales of the activities in daily questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS
The statistically significant results are consistent with the hypothesis that for PD patients on drug therapy, the Alexander Technique reduces depression and improves the management of disability, but in the absence of a control group and a larger sample, they cannot be said to confirm the hypothesis. The likelihood of the AT being effective in the management of disability for many PD patients, as shown in this study, makes further controlled research desirable.

Copyright © Clinical Rehabilitation.
Reproduced by permission of the publisher.
Note: The author has completed and recently published a larger study into the effects of Alexander Technique on disability in PD at the University of Westminster. See the page on this site on Recently completed research and work in progress.


Enhanced Respiratory Muscular Function in Normal Adults after Lessons in Proprioceptive Musculoskeletal Education without Exercises
Authors: J.H.M. Austin, P. Ausubel
Journal: Chest (1992) 102 486-490

Abstract:
A subjective sense of enhanced ease of breathing has been described after instruction in the Alexander Technique of proprioceptive musculoskeletal education (awareness and voluntary inhibition of personal habitual patterns of rigid musculoskeletal constriction). We investigated the effects of AT instruction on respiratory function in healthy adult volunteers (group 1, ten subjects) who received 20 private AT lessons at weekly intervals. Spirometric tests, including maximum static mouth pressures, were assessed before and after each course of lessons. Healthy control subjects, matched for age, gender, height, and weight (group 2, ten subjects), without instruction, were tested over a similar interval. Group 1 showed significant increases in PEF (9 percent, p<.05), MVV (6 percent, p<.05), MIP (12 percent, p<.02) and MEP (9 percent, p.<.005) (paired Student's t testing). Group 2 showed no significant changes. Possible mechanisms for the changes in group 1 include increased length and decreased resting tension of muscles of the torso, which in turn may increase their strength, increase thoracic compliance, and/or enhance coordination. We conclude that AT musculoskeletal education may enhance muscular function in normal adult subjects.

Copyright © Chest.
Reproduced by permission of the publisher.
To consult the whole article, contact www.chestjournal.org


Go to:
top of this page
home
map of website